Datum: 17-3-2022
Is it important that we find out whether SAR-CoV-2 originated from a natural source or due to human activity in a lab? Of course it is! The solutions you need to apply to each source are entirely different. Getting this right is important for all sorts of reasons. Not least of those reasons is that millions of lives were lost and billions of lives were upended as a consequence.You’d think the media would be all over this story and exceptionally interested in getting to the bottom of it all. But, you’d be wrong. Instead, the media not only ignored the lab leak angle for over a year, they demonized anybody who dared to explore that option. As a result, they gave far more credence to the natural origin story and failed to correct their many mistakes. Now the NYTimes is clearly, obviously committed to promoting the "natural origin" angle above any other possibilities. You might want to ask yourself why that is...? To me, the data is thick and rich and increasingly and overwhelmingly points to SARS-CoV-2 having arisen as a result of human efforts in a lab. So, what does the New York Times do in the face of all that evidence? They pounce on a couple of pre-print papers written largely by the same scientist already caught up in the Fauci-email cover-up scandal, and then completely fail to point out that massive conflict of interest to its readers. How was that left out? Again, you might ask yourself how that 'oversight' might have occurred...? This was terrible journalism, worse science reporting, and the pre-prints themselves prove absolutely nothing at all. They fail to advance science in any way. All in all, a big fat “F” for all involved. Links to References in This Video: NY Times Article https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2... NY Post 80,00 animals tested, no SARS2 https://nypost.com/2021/05/22/the-wuh... Washington Post Rasmussen/Goldstein natural origins editorial https://www.washingtonpost.com/outloo... Alina Chan Map: https://twitter.com/Ayjchan/status/14... NYTimes Editors email addresses: dean.baquet@nytimes.com joe.kahn@nytimes.com letters@nytimes.com
Deel dit bericht
pageviews: 2292
Dr. Redfield On Rising: Gain-of-Function Research will Cause The 'next great pandemic'
Gravitas: Lab leak "most likely" source of Covid-19, British MPs told
Origin of Covid: Alina and Matt Testify for UK Parliament
7/6/21 - e-mail verkeer Koopmans en Fouchier in CV19 zaak afgelakt.
Marion Koopmans uit onderzoeksteam van de WHO gezet wegens banden met de Chinese Communistische Partij
Viral: The Search for the Origin of COVID-19
Did SARS-CoV-2 Leak from Wuhan Lab? | Covid Origin Evidence Explained
Jim Jordan Resumes Attacks On Dr. Fauci Over COVID-19 Origins, Mask Guidance
Fauci Explodes on Rand Paul After Being Confronted on Misleading Testimony
Hannity: Dr. Fauci was 'visibly shaken' during Congressional testimony
Experts in de VS: 'Als we eerder hadden geweten dat het virus uit het lab kwam hadden we levens kunnen redden'
Anthony Fauci questoned by Senator Rand Paul about role in funding Wuhan Lab experiments with coronavirus in bats
'Waarom SARS-CoV-2 virus uit Wuhan lab ontsnapt moet zijn.' Een gesprek met Jan Bonte
Fauci 'should be in jail': Majorie Taylor Greene calls for Anthony Fauci to be prosecuted
Rand Paul to send letter asking for criminal referral on Dr Anthony Fauci
House Republicans Hearing On COVID-19 Origin, Explore Lab-Leak Theory
'Not A Single Animal Has Been Found': Top House Republican Discusses Evidence For Lab-Leak Theory
WHO Investigator Admitted A Year Ago That Chinese Labs Manipulated Coronaviruses, Now Denies That Happened With COVID-19
WHO’s “investigation” into the Wuhan lab was conducted in part by a CCP advisor, Marion Koopmans